Ei mitään nähtävää (Nothing to see) presents nondescript landscapes and random videos. Boring aesthetics without an obvious narrative.
The objective of the exhibition is to rise questions about seeing and watching. How to watch, when there is nothing to see? Or when seeing is not enough and one just has to watch?
I have been looking for methods for visualizing things and moments that are not really visible. Thought what kind of influence framing the perception and naming things have in becoming visible and recognizable.

Watch, look at or contemplate the works and make up your mind.  Despite the name there are things to watch in the exhibition.
mattitainio   back